GURUSCOPE
guruscopeguruprojectoption
creator--idprojectoption
P

projectfinance

@projectoption · YOUTUBE
INDEXED · 2 VERIFIED · < 1M
CAT
TECHNICAL
Investing style category
RISK
SPECULATIVE
Risk tolerance level
TIER
INSUFFICIENT
Sample size reliability tier
PRED
10
Total predictions analyzed
GRADE
F
Overall letter grade
35
Credibility
Overall credibility across all dimensions
F
SIG — · n=2
Statistical significance of results given sample size
SCORECARD · n=2
8 supporting credibility dimensions, Bayes-weighted for sample size
Accuracy
0
10 CALLS
Percentage of predictions that were correct
Alpha
0
−24.4%
Returns above the S&P 500 benchmark
Calibration
86
BRIERBrier score: lower means better calibrated
How well stated confidence matches actual outcomes
Sentiment
100
DRIFTHow much sentiment shifted over time
Consistency of bullish/bearish stance over time
Risk
50
DOWNSIDEDownside risk acknowledgment score
Awareness of downside scenarios and risk factors
Disclosure
0
0%
Transparency about holdings and conflicts of interest
Survival
50
ARCHIVEDHandling of deleted or hidden predictions
Honesty about past missed or failed predictions
Risk-Adj
27
SHARPERisk-adjusted return ratio
Performance score adjusted for risk taken
PREDICTION TIMELINE · CONFIDENCE × DATE
Each marker is a prediction: position shows date and confidence, shape shows outcome
HIGHMEDLOW1Y AGO9M6M3MNOW
CORRECT WRONG PARTIAL PENDING
DISCLOSURE AUDIT · TR12M
Transparency audit (trailing 12 months): how often this creator discloses holdings, promotions, and conflicts
HOLDINGS DISCLOSEDTimes the creator disclosed holding the asset0
PROMOTIONS TAGGEDPaid promotions that were labeled as such0
“NOT ADVICE” DISC.Standard disclaimers included0
ZERO DISCLOSURERecommendations with no disclosure at all10
DELETED CONTENT · ARCHIVED
Content the creator deleted after publishing (archived by GuruScope)
NO ARCHIVED CONTENT
PREDICTIONS10 PREDICTIONS
DEEP ANALYSIS · CONFOUNDERS · CONSENSUS
CONFOUNDERS · CLASSIFIED · n=3
External factors that may have influenced prediction outcomes beyond skill
timing issue
n=1
The analysis is based on a very limited number of market-timed predictions (only 2), making the 0% accuracy and negative alpha highly sensitive to individual outcomes and potentially unrepresentative of long-term performance.
oversimplification
n=1
The overall accuracy metric (0%) is largely influenced by including 'narrative' predictions that are foundational explanations of options strategies (100% correct) rather than actual market calls. This distinction is crucial as the guru performs well on explanations but poorly on direct market timing.
market conditions
n=1
The incorrect Bitcoin and IBIT buy calls occurred during a period where these specific assets experienced significant drawdowns, contributing to the negative alpha.
CONSENSUS · TOP ASSETS
Most frequently predicted assets with accuracy breakdown
Options strategies (general)2100%
Implied volatility (NVDA options)2100%
NVDA (implied volatility)1100%
NVDA 220c (May 2026)1100%
NVDA (220 strike call option)1100%